Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

Med Arch. 2021; 75(3): 204-208


Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)

Melisa Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Alma Biscevic,, Amila Alikadic-Husovic, Nita Bejdic, Maja Bohac.




Abstract

Background: The creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers. Objective: To analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different methods for flap creation in Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: This was a retrospective study. The thickness and morphology of the flap were compared between the two mechanical microkeratomes (group I – Moria M2, group II – Moria SBK One Use Plus) and femtosecond laser (group III – Ziemer Femto LDV). Central flap thickness was measured intraoperatively, while the flap profile was measured with anterior optical coherence tomography at two axes (90° and 180°) and 5 measuring points on the first day, the first week, and one month after the surgery. Results: Central flap thickness was 110.91±15.79 micrometers (µm) (80-164 µm) in group I, 98.08±13.33 µm (65-136 µm) in group II and 103.52±13.89 µm (66-138 µm) in group III. Anterior optical coherence tomography revealed a meniscus-shaped flap in all three groups at both axes (90° and 180°). The least variability in flap thickness was observed in group III (±6 µm). Conclusion: All three methods of flap creation provide good shape and thickness reproducibility. Ziemer Femto LDV femtosecond laser had the least variable flap thickness in a single flap. Mechanical microkeratomes had slightly lower performance. 

Key words: LASIK, refractive surgery, mechanical microkeratome, femtosecond laser, corneal flap.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.