Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

BMB. 2021; 6(4): 0-0


Factors Affecting the Diagnostic Accuracy of Endometrial Pipelle® Biopsy

alper seyhan.




Abstract

SUMMARY:
AIM : In this study we aimed to compare the endometrial suction biopsy (ESB) with Pipelle® and endometrial curettage (D&C) findings from patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and/or endometrial thickness to observe the possible influencing factors on ESB’s diagnostic value.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In Tekirdağ Community Hospital and Gynecology Clinic; retrospectively, data were collected from hospital registry. 122 patients were selected who had abnormal uterine bleeding and/or endometrial thickness and from all cases, endometrial biopsy were taken as Pipelle® and D&C methods at the same time. In conclusion, pathologic results of two methods were compared.
RESULTS: Pathology results were as follows: By Pipelle®, 44 patients (36.1 %) with endometrial polyps, 26 patients (21.3%) with endometrial atrophy, 31 patients (25.4%) with proliferative endometrium, 11 patients (9%) with secretory endometrium, 4 patients (3.3%) with endometrial carcinoma, 1 patient (0.8%) with hyperplasia without atypia, 2 patients (1.6%) with inflammation; by D&C, 55 patients (45.1%) with polyp, 20 patients (16.4%) with endometrial atrophy, 34 patients (27.9%) with proliferative endometrium, 9 patients (7.4%) with secretory endometrium, 4 patients (3.3%) with endometrial carcinoma, 1 patient (0.8%) with hyperplasia without atypia, 2 patients (1.6%) with inflammation. Correlation between two methods were found as 97.6%, 95.3% , 91.7% , 98.3% , 100% , 100%, and 100%. For proliferative endometrium, atrophy, polyp, secretory endometrium, endometrial cancer, hyperplasia without atypia and inflammation, respectively. Discorrelation between two diagnostic methods more commonly seen in endometrial polyp pathology.
CONCLUSION: Our study findings revealed very high correlations between the pathology results of Pipelle® and D&C procedures. Pipelle®, with the advantages of being a simple outpatient procedure and having less complication rates can be preferred over D&C reliably in most clinic situations. On the other hand, D&C method should be preferred in cases of endometrial polyp pathologies due to increased discorrelation rates and biopsy failures in Pipelle® biopsy.
KEY WORDS:
Uterine bleeding; Pipelle® Biopsy; Dilatation and curettage; Endometrial thickness

Key words: Uterine bleeding; Pipelle® Biopsy; Dilatation and curettage; Endometrial thickness






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.