Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

BMB. 2022; 7(1): 63-69


Recombinant Fsh versus highly purified urinary Fsh in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing icsi cycles: a prospective randomized study

Öner Aynıoğlu, Yasin Ceylan, Bertan Akar, Sebiha Özdemir Özkan, Eray Çalışkan, Emek Doger, Yiğit Çakıroğlu.




Abstract

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of recombinant FSH (r-FSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (HP-uFSH) in PCOS patients undergoing ICSI
Materials and methods: This was a prospective randomized study conducted at Kocaeli University, Medical School, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit. A total of 91 PCOS patients undergoing ICSI were randomly assigned to receive either r-FSH (n=46) or HP-uFSH (n=45) with a GnRH antagonist protocol. The main outcome measures were the number of mature oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, pregnancy rates, implantation rates.
Results: The number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates, the number of cryopreserved embryos were significantly higher in r-FSH group (p=0.024, p=0.023, p=0.026 respectively) while the total dose of FSH used was significantly lower in the same group (p=0.023). Pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates were higher in r-FSH group although not statistically significant (52.2% versus 35.6%, p=0.11, 37% versus 28.9%, p=0.41 respectively). Overall therapy costs per clinical pregnancy were associated with a 9.94% increase in r-FSH group whereas costs per pregnancy were not different between groups.
Conclusion: r-FSH is superior than HP-uFSH in PCOS regarding fertilization rates, the number of mature oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved embryos, pregnancy rates although overall therapy costs per clinical pregnancy are higher.

Key words: Rec-FSH, HP-uFSH, PCOS, ART






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.