Expanding the contemporary grammar tradition a number of research has been done by Dummett M. (1973), J.L. Shaw (2010), Bhattacharya, S. (1990), Kalyanamalini Sahoo (1998), S. Mohanty & et.el (2002), S. Janardan & et.el (2018) in modern time to find out the relationship of binding nature of language and its related pairs. And most of the modern criticism is only superficially trying to cater the Subject predicate relationship in terms of structuralism theory or by case relational principles. And in this way the modern grammarians are not able to distinguish the Nouns vs. Qualificand and also the term qualifiers vs. adjective/adverbs/similar nature phrases or expressions in in language. And looking to this though the Sanskrit has a long tradition of this analysis and merging together the Grammar with logic, philosophy and mathematics. But nowhere, the language developed after the Sanskrit like Hindi or Odia are discussed their language grammar so deeply or in merge unlike Sanskrit. Therefore, here the paper is trying to analyze the Qualifier-Qualificand relationship in Odia language going beyond the relationship of NP Phrase or VP Phrase or adjective phrase. And sustain the discussion; here we consider gain Navyanyaya principles of argument to cater and determine that only the Qualifier and Qualificand relationship is the semantic determiner of a sentence not NP Phrase or VP phrase.
Key words: Odia Language, Qualificand, Qualifier, Noun, Adjective, Verb, Mimansa, Navyanyaya
|
