Home|Journals|Articles by Year Follow on Twitter

Directory for Medical Articles

Open Access

Original Research

Acta Inform Med. 2010; 18(4): 191-195

Evaluation of Prognostic Scoring Systems in the Prediction of the Outcome in Critically Ill Patients with Perforative Peritonitis

Samir Delibegovic, Dragana Markovic, Samir Hodzic, Amir Nuhanovic.

Background: Patients with perforative peritonitis are among the most complex cases encountered in surgical practice. Early prognostic evaluation of these patients is desirable in order to make the correct therapeutic plan, selecting highly risky patients for less aggressive surgical procedures. Prospective evaluation of different prognostic scoring systems was performed in order to assess the possibility of prediction of outcome in these patients. Patients and methods: The prospective study of 145 patients with perforative peritonitis was performed. The main outcome of this study was peritonitis-related death. Variables necessary for calculation of the scoring systems were recorded at the initial admission to the hospital (during the first 24 hours) and the third and seventh day of hospitalization, except Mannheim Peritonitis Index, which was calculated during the first 24 hours after hospitalization, i.e. during laparatomy. Sensitivity and specificity are graphically shown for the different values of cut-off points. Results: ROC curve for TISS -28 and APACHE II is significantly more accurate in comparison with other scores. The area under the curve for the first postoperative day was 0.87 for TISS-28 score, 0.86 for APACHE II score, 0.83 for MOF, 0.83 for SAPS I, 0.72 for MPI score, 0.70 for Sepsis score. In addition, this discriminatory ability remained on the third and seventh postoperative day as well. The highest rate of correlation between the observed and the expected mortality rate was in APACHE II system, for the first (Kendall’s τ correlation 0.964) and the third (Kendall’s τ correlation 0.8l0) day. There was a decrease in the rate of correlation on the seventh day for all scoring systems except for MOF score. Conclusion: APACHE II is better in prediction of the outcome to other tested scoring systems.

Key words: peritonitis, APACHE II, Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Similar Articles

A Call for Change. Can 3D Printing Replace Cadavers for Surgical Training?
Ghazi A
The Urologic clinics of North America. 2022; 49(1): 39-56

Lanthanide metal-organic framework as a paper strip sensor for visual detection of sulfonamide with smartphone-based point-of-care platform.
Yan J, Zhang J, Zhang M, Shi G
Talanta. 2022; 237(): 122920

The Evolution of Surgical Techniques and Biomaterials for Periodontal Regeneration.
Pagni G, Tavelli L, Rasperini G
Dental clinics of North America. 2022; 66(1): 75-85

Evaluating the Efficacy of Combined P188 Treatment and Surgical Intervention in Preventing Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Following a Traumatic Knee Injury.
Narez GE, Brown G, Herrick A, Ek RJ, Dejardin L, Wei F, Haut RC, Haut Donahue TL
Journal of biomechanical engineering. 2022; 144(4):

Evaluation of surgical oncology fellowship websites: Are we showing what applicants need to see?
Aryanpour Z, Ananthasekar S, Rajan SS, Reddy S
Surgery open science. 2022; 7(): 1-5

Full-text options

Latest Statistics about COVID-19
• pubstat.org

Add your Article(s) to Indexes
• citeindex.org

Covid-19 Trends and Statistics
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright ScopeMed Information Services.

ScopeMed Web Sites