ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Percutaneous Pinning Versus ORIF For Treatment Of Extraarticular Metacarpal Fractures

Mahmut Özdemir, Mert Karaduman, Mustafa Caner Okkaoğlu, Hakan Şeşen, İsmail Demirkale, Murat Altay.




Abstract

Objectives: Metacarpal fractures are common, and several surgical treatment methods have been described. This study aims to compare the clinical and economic aspects of two different surgical methods, closed reduction and K-wire fixation (CRPF) and open reduction and plate screw fixation (ORIF).
Methods: Between January 2009 and March 2014, 51 patients who received surgical treatment for metacarpal fractures were retrospectively evaluated. Of them, 36 patients (29M, 7F) performed CRPF, and 15 (12M, 3F) performed ORIF. Patients were followed up for an average of 17.6 weeks. All patients were assessed according to the union, operation time, complications, cost-effectiveness, and the Michigan hand outcome questionnaire scores.
Results: The mean operation time was 13.7 minutes (5-37 minutes) in the CRPF group and 32.2 minutes (23-62 minutes) in the ORIF group (p

Key words: metacarpal fractures, open reduction, and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, cost






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.