Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement

Nafija Serdarevic.




Abstract

Introduction: The carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) is a marker for pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. In our study, we have investigated the level of CA 19-9 at 50 patients with benign and malign disease using three immunoassays. Methods: The COBAS e 601 (Roche) uses an ECLIA, Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott) uses CMIA and VITROS 5600 uses integrated System Intellicheck Technology with cut off 0.0-37.0 U/mL for determination of CA 19-9. Results were with a statistical significance of p < 0.05. Results:  Comparison of CA19-9 on COBAS with Architect show correlation coefficient R = 0.708. The results showed a regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Cobas) = 16.14 x (Architect) + 0.53. The comparison of CA19-9 on Architect and Cobas show correlation coefficient R = 0.709. The results showed regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Vitros) =–5.558 + 2.432 x (Architect) and correlation coefficient R = 0. 990. The mean concentration of CA 19-9 in the CMIA method was 41.49 U/mL, Intellicheck Technology was 103.45 U/mL and using ECLIA method was 47.25 U/mL at patients. Conclusions: Patients should be monitored on a single method to avoid differences in the results. The various immunoassay techniques for the detection of CA 19-9 tumor marker using different monoclonal antibodies, which leads to different results. Different antibodies recognize different parts of the molecule, and antigen heterogeneity may account in part for inter-method differences. 

Key words: CMIA, ECLIA, System Intellicheck Technology and CA19-9.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.