Home|Journals|Articles by Year Follow on Twitter

Directory for Medical Articles
 

Open Access

Original Article



Presenting an Evaluation Model for the Cancer Registry Software

Hamid Moghaddasi, Farkhondeh Asadi, Reza Rabiei, Farough Rahimi, Reihaneh Shahbodaghi.

Abstract
Objectives: As cancer is increasingly growing, cancer registry is of great importance as the main core of cancer control programs, and many different software has been designed for this purpose. Therefore, establishing a comprehensive evaluation model is essential to evaluate and compare a wide range of such software. Methods: In this study, the criteria of the cancer registry software have been determined by studying the documents and two functional software of this field. The evaluation tool was a checklist and in order to validate the model, this checklist was presented to experts in the form of a questionnaire. To analyze the results of validation, an agreed coefficient of %75 was determined in order to apply changes. Finally, when the model was approved, the final version of the evaluation model for the cancer registry software was presented. Results: The evaluation model of this study contains tool and method of evaluation. The evaluation tool is a checklist including the general and specific criteria of the cancer registry software along with their sub-criteria. The evaluation method of this study was chosen as a criteria-based evaluation method based on the findings. Conclusion: The model of this study encompasses various dimensions of cancer registry software and a proper method for evaluating it. The strong point of this evaluation model is the separation between general criteria and the specific ones, while trying to fulfill the comprehensiveness of the criteria. Since this model has been validated, it can be used as a standard to evaluate the cancer registry software.

Key words: cancer registry, cancer registry software, evaluation model.



Similar Articles

Disparities in Genetic Testing for Heritable Solid-Tumor Malignancies.
Dillon J, Ademuyiwa FO, Barrett M, Moss HA, Wignall E, Menendez C, Hughes KS, Plichta JK
Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2022; 31(1): 109-126

Using the Health Belief Model to examine travelers' willingness to vaccinate and support for vaccination requirements prior to travel.
Suess C, Maddock J, Dogru T, Mody M, Lee S
Tourism management. 2022; 88(): 104405

Financial Toxicity and Shared Decision Making in Oncology.
Greenup RA
Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2022; 31(1): 1-7

Synthesis of enhanced corrosion resistant Fe-B-C-Ti amorphous ribbons and evaluation of their photodegradation efficiency under light irradiation.
Zuo M, Moztahida M, Lee DS, Yi S
Chemosphere. 2022; 287(Pt 2): 132175

Epsin 3 potentiates the NF‑κB signaling pathway to regulate apoptosis in breast cancer.
Wu Q, Li Q, Zhu W, Zhang X, Li H
Molecular medicine reports. 2022; 25(1):


Full-text options


Latest Statistics about COVID-19
• pubstat.org


Add your Article(s) to Indexes
• citeindex.org






Covid-19 Trends and Statistics
ScopeMed.com
CiteIndex.org
CancerLine
FoodsLine
PhytoMedline
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright ScopeMed Information Services.



ScopeMed Web Sites