ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2026; 51(2): 404-409


Comparative effectiveness of secretome, bacterial nanocellulose dressing, freeze-dried human amniotic membrane, and paraffin gauze dressing in promoting donor site healing following intermediate split-thickness skin grafting

Williams Imanuel Mesang, David Perdanakusuma, Indri Lakhsmi Putri.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of biological and conventional dressings on split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) donor wound healing.
Methodology: This quasi-experimental study with post-test control group design was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, from April to November 2024. A total of 21 patients who underwent intermediate STSG were included. In each patient, four standard donor wounds measuring 50×50 mm were created on the upper thigh, which were randomly allocated to secretome, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC), freeze-dried human amniotic membrane (FDHAM), and paraffin gauze dressing (PGD) groups. Evaluation was performed on days 7, 10, and 14 postoperatively, including area and percentage of epithelialization, epithelialization rate, pain intensity using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and infection rate based on swab culture. Statistical analysis used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
Results: The secretome group showed significantly higher epithelialization area and rate compared to FDHAM and PGD at all observation times (p

Key words: Wound healing, Secretome, bacterial nanocellulose dressing (BND), Freeze-dried human amniotic membrane (FDHAM), Epithelialization.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

4
8
R
E
A
D
S

11

11
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
0506
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.