Original Research |
| |
A comparative study of peak expiratory flow rate between midozolam induced and propofol induced post anesthetic patients in recovery phase conducted at Government Hospital Chittoor- a district of South IndiaSeema Sankeshwari, Ambuja Sambrani, Mahajabeen Madarkar, Sangeeta Dhulappanavar Ravi, Devarapalli Srikanth. Abstract | | | | Background:
Most airway obstruction i.e. about 89% occurs during general anesthesia and 70% involve upper airway. Henceforth, choosing an appropriate choice of sedative to decrease the respiratory morbidity during post anesthetic period is utmost important.
Aim:
To analyze the peak expiratory flow rate in propofol & midazolam induced post anesthetic patients separately and compare.
Methods:
This is a comparative study of measuring PEFR in post anesthetic patients between propofol induced and midazolam induced patients. A sample size of 30 were taken, among which 15 were propofol induced and 15 were midazolam induced subjects.
Results:
Mean values of Avg PEFR readings of propofol and midazolam showed a p-value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant. Mean PEFR values of Males and Females in Propofol induction showed a p-value of 0.0007 which is statistically significant. Mean PEFR values of Males and Females in Midazolam induction showed a p-value of 0.0092 which is statistically significant.
Conclusion:
Midazolam significantly depresses respiratory system more than propofol. And females irrespective of the anesthetic drug used for induction showed low PEFR values as compared to males.
Key words: Propofol, Midazolam, PEFR in Anesthesia, Anesthesia in respiratory illness, Comparison between midazolam and propofol in sedation
|
|
|
|