ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Comparison of two blind brachial plexus blocks in goat cadavers.

Sunisa Sirimongkolvorakul, Tanasid Sornphu..



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Objective: This study aimed to compare two approaches to the brachial plexus: the traditional blind method and an additional technique, both of which use anatomical landmarks to guide needle insertion.
Materials and Methods: The traditional and additional approaches were performed on both thoracic limbs of 24 cadavers (24 for each approach). Methylene dye is used for injection and nerve staining. We counted the nerves that successfully stained (staining less than 1 cm). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare approaches.
Results: The findings indicated that all cadavers were successfully used. The traditional approach and the additional approach revealed success rates of 45.83% and 54.17%, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two techniques (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The additional approach presents a viable alternative to the traditional method for performing the brachial plexus block in goats. Further research into the clinical differences between these techniques could lead to useful insights that help make them more accurate and useful.

Key words: Additional approach; brachial plexus block; goat cadaver; methylene blue; traditional approach.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

29
97
26
25
23
21
26
26
31
29
27
7
R
E
A
D
S

24

41

28

30

13

19

30

23

31

23

18

2
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
060708091011120102030405
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.