Aim: This study aims at examining the differences between thermoluminescense dosimeters and metal oxide semiconductor field effect
transistors in terms of radiation doses at different photon energies treatment area dependence in patients who recieved radiotherapy at
the Department of Radiation Oncology, Inonu University.
Material and Methods: Thermoluminescense dosimeter systems and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors were used at 6MV
and 25MV in the range of 25-1000 cGy radiation doses to examine radiation dose dependence. Results were evaluated by taking
measurements of treatment areas 5x5, 10x10, 15x15, 20x20, 25x25, 30x30, and 40x40 cm², respectively, to specify treatment area
dependence of these systems.
Results: In both thermoluminescense dosimeters (TLD) and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET), reading values at
6 MV and 25 MV photon energies remained up to 800 cGy. We observed that both systems deviate from linearity at doses above 800 cGy.
In TLDs, we recorded a % 00 B1 (6 MV photon energy) and %+4 (25 MV photon energy) change in reading values. This change was % oo B1 1 (6 MV photon energy) and %+4 (25 MV photon energy) in MOSFETs.
Conclusion: Both dosimeter systems have advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy and applicability. Being familiar with
dosimeter systems is very important in identifying the accuracy of dose to be admisnistered.
Key words: Radiotherapy; Invivo dosimeter; Thermoluminescense Dosimeter; Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor; Linear
accelerator.
|
