Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Research Article

Open Vet J. 2024; 14(8): 1789-1793


Comparison of four different protocols using levobupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius)

Paulo Cesar Mendes Dos Santos Filho, Leticia Prata Juliano Dimatteu Telles, Elane Barboza da Silva, Dandara Franco Ferreira da Silva, Líria Queiroz Luz Hirano.




Abstract

Background:
The popularity of tortoises kept in captivity is increasing and has caused concern regarding the necessity to establish safe and straightforward anesthesia for those reptiles.
Aim:
This study aimed to compare four protocols using levobupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for blockade of the caudal neuraxis of red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius).
Methods:
Twenty-four tortoises were randomly assigned into 4 groups: G1, levobupivacaine 0.75% (1.15 mg kg-1); G2, levobupivacaine 0.37% (1.15 mg kg-1); G3, levobupivacaine 0.75% (2.3 mg kg-1); and G4, levobupivacaine 0.75% (0.1 ml 5 cm-1 of straight carapace length). Tortoises were evaluated for respiratory rate, muscle relaxation, response to hindlimb or tail pinch, and cloacal reflex.
Results:
A 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.37% appears adequate for shorter procedures, whereas a 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.75% should be appropriate for longer procedures in red-footed tortoises.
Conclusion:
Our results are the first to show the effects of levobupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in reptiles. Weight-based doses presented more intense and more homogeneous effects than carapace length-based dose in red-footed tortoises. Spinal anesthesia of red-footed tortoises was safe and effective with any of the weight-based protocols.

Key words: Testudines, Loco-regional anesthesia, Neuraxis blockade, Local anesthetics, Reptiles






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.