ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Comparison of microbiological parameters in experimental and conventional recirculation aquaculture systems

Ivaylo Sirakov, Katya Velichkova, Stefka Stoyanova.



Abstract
Download PDF Cited by 6 ArticlesPost

The purpose of current study was to compare the influence on sanitary - hygienic parameters of water in recirculation aquaculture systems (RAS) using natural zeolite and macrophytes Lemna minor and Elodea canadensis like a part of its filtration system with the microbiological indicators of water in conventional RAS. For the quantitative determination the total number of mesophilic microorganisms in 1 ml of water, and the number of certain sanitary indicative (coliforms, E.coli, Enterobacteriaceae) and pathogenic (Salmonella spp.) microorganism were used textile substrates with pre-installed on them selective chromogenic nutrient media. Microbiological testing of water in the both recirculation systems indicated that the total number microorganisms, sanitary indicative coliform bacteria as well as pathogens from the genus Salmonella in recirculation system using natural zeolite and macrophytes like a filter more rapidly declined their numbers compared with microbiological parameters of conventional RAS.

Key words: Key words: macrophyte, microbiological parameters, RAS, zeolite







Bibliomed Article Statistics

26
34
25
32
26
22
17
24
21
28
26
22
R
E
A
D
S

5

9

13

57

12

15

6

16

13

22

10

12
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
030405060708091011120102
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.