Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



A comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness of topical medications for the treatment of dry eye syndrome in a tertiary care teaching hospital at Dehradun, Uttarakhand

Saubhagya Sindhu, Shaktibala Dutta, Mirza Atif Beg, Sanjeev Mittal, Sushobhan Das Gupta.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

Background: Dry eye is a common ophthalmological disorder causing ocular discomfort and affecting individual’s daily activities. Artificial tears had been the mainstay of treatment since long. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the newer treatment modalities.

Objective: This study compares cost-effectiveness of topical medications used for the treatment of dry eye syndrome in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Materials & Methods: A total of 60 patients diagnosed with dry eye were enrolled for a study period of 1 year. Patient of either sex (male/female), aged 18–70 years, and all diagnosed cases of dry eye in ophthalmology outpatient department were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (n = 30) topical carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and group II (n = 30) CMC + NSAID. Diagnostic tests included were Schirmer’s test and tear breakup time (TBUT). Comparison and analysis of cost, efficacy, and safety between the two groups was carried out at the end of the study period (12 weeks) using GraphPad InStat software. p-Value of

Key words: Dry eye, artificial tear, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cost-effectiveness






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.