Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2024; 49(3): 620-623


Ensuring accuracy of endotracheal tube placement by performing upper airway ultrasonography vs chest auscultation

Muhammad Asad Altaf, Inayat Ali Khan, Barkat Ullah, Ayaz Ghulam Rasool, Muhabbat Ali Khaki, Abdul Sami Qureshi.




Abstract

Objective: To determine the fastest technique (chest auscultation or upper airway ultrasonography) for confirming endotracheal tube placement in critically ill patients.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study included 110 critically ill patients of age >18 years who requires endotracheal intubation and were selected from emergency department of Ziauddin University Hospital (North Campus) Karachi by using non-probability consecutive sampling technique. 110 patients of ASA grade E were envaulted clinically and position of endotracheal tube was confirmed on chest auscultation (breath sounds presence) and upper airway ultrasonography (presence of lung sliding sign). Time required for both techniques was recorded.
Results: Endotracheal tube placement was 100.0% in critically ill patients; of which male were 60.0% and female were 40.0% having mean age of 55.21±16.66 years. Respiratory failure (62.7%) was the most common presentation in critically ill patients followed by heart failure (16.4%), renal failure (16.4%), low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS; 6.4%) and cerebrovascular accident (CVA; 4.5%). Endotracheal tube placement confirmation was more rapid in upper airway ultrasonography (7.40±2.31 seconds) as compared to chest auscultation (10.34±2.75 seconds).
Conclusion: Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement was faster with upper airway ultrasonography than with chest auscultation.

Key words: Endotracheal tube, auscultation, ultrasonography, intubation, emergency,critically ill.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.