Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Review Article



The comparative effectiveness of first-line treatment EGFR TKIs in Asian lung cancer population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Wisnu Donowati, Erna Kristin, Susanna Hilda Hutajulu, Dwi Endarti, Ricvan Dana Nindrea.




Abstract

Nonsmall cell lung cancer is the most common carcinoma in Asia with more than half identified as epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+). First- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a targeted therapy type, improved overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy. We conducted an updated review comparing the clinical effectiveness of EGFR TKIs as a first-line treatment in Asian populations with EGFRm+. This systematic search was conducted in six databases, resulting in 30 eligible articles, which represented Asian ethnicity and were appraised quantitatively using the GRACE checklist. Thirteen eligible studies and 3,465 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Two models of effectiveness comparison were used to measure the pooled size effect: afatinib and dacomitinib. Afatinib in patients with brain metastases had a higher risk of progression and death, but lower time to treatment failure (TTF). Never-smoking patients had lower risk of TTF and death, but equivalent risk for progression. Dacomitinib had a lower risk of progression and death. Exon 19 deletion (e19del) or exon 21 substitution (L858R) benefited more from the second generation. L858R had a higher risk of survival, progression-free, and overall survival than e19del with second-generation agents. Coexisting e19del or L858R in uncommon mutation is associated with longer progression than without it.

Key words: lung cancer, Asian, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, tyrosine kinase inhibitors






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.